1. Would you like to try some the Foot (Food)? It’s very delicious.
คุณอยากจะลองกินส้นตี(อาหาร)ไทย บ้างไหม? อร่อยนะ (จะบอกให้ หมักถุงเท้ามา 3 วันแล้ว)

2. Acharn Chris , I will give you a Massage(Message) tomorrow.
อาจารย์คริสขา เดี๋ยวพรุ่งนี้หนูนวด(ส่งข้อความ) ให้นะคะ (มาเลยกำลังเมื่อยพอดี)

3. I was Burn (Born) in Bangkok in 1997.
ฉันถูกเผา(เกิด)ที่กรุงเทพฯในปี1997 (เฮ้ย อย่างนี้ก็ผีนี่หว่า)

4. I ate Lice (Rice) with my friend yesterday.
เมื่อวานนี้ผมไปกินเหา(ข้าว) กับแฟน (เชื้อโรคกระจายทั่วร่างกาย)

5. I like to watch Goat (Ghost) movies.
ผมชอบดูหนังแพะ (ผี) มาก ( สงสัยบ้านผีแพะภาค 8 )

6. I like to Freeze (Feed) my dog every Sunday.
ผมชอบเอาหมาไปแช่แข็ง(ให้อาหาร) ทุกวันอาทิตย์ (แล้วพอวันอังคารก็เอามันมาตุ๋นยาจีน)

7. Can I have a Shit (Cheese) Burger and a Feet (fish) Burger please?
ขอเบอร์เกอร์ขี้ (ชีส) กับเบอร์เกอร์ตี (ปลา) หน่อยครับ (อาหารเด็ดประจำแมคเขา ว่าแต่สาขาไหนฟะ)

8. Can I have some French Flies (Fries) please?
ขอแมลงวันฝรั่งเศสทอด (มันฝรั่งทอด) 1 ที่ค่ะ (อร่อยมั้ยอ่ะ)

9. I like to Pray (Play) computer at night.
ผมชอบไหว้ (เล่น) คอมพิวเตอร์ตอนกลางคืน (สงสัยคอมฯ บ้านนี้จะศักดิ์สิทธิ์ ขอหวยกันทุกวัน)

10. Wow, look at the big Cow (Crown) on Miss Thailand’s head.
โอ้โห วัว(มงกุฎ) บนหัวมิสไทยแลนด์ใหญ่จังเลย (นางสาวไทย นะยะ ไม่ใช่นางงามจัมโบ้)

11. I like to brush my Teats (Teeth) before I go to bed.
ดิฉันชอบแปรงนม(ฟัน)ก่อนนอนทุกคืน (ช่วยแปรงได้ไหมเนี่ย) หมายเหตุ : นม = หน้าอก

12. I like Porn (Prawns).
ผมชอบหนังโป๊ (กุ้ง) (เอามาแบ่งกันดูบ้างสิไอ้น้อง)

13. John I hate you, you are a Batman (Bad man).
จอห์น ฉันเกลียดคุณ คุณเป็นมนุษย์ค้างคาว(ผู้ชายไม่ดี)

เเละอย่าลืมเม้นด้วยนะครับ ^^

เครดิต : http://www.vcharkarn.com/vcafe/145182

Comment

Comment:

Tweet

Hi to every body, it's my first pay a quick visit of this weblog; this weblog carries remarkable and actually good data for readers. wow gold http://www.mmogm.com/wow/

#118 By wow gold (103.7.57.18|142.4.117.33) on 2013-03-30 06:32

V5uDAz <a href="http://cpjonfueuouj.com/">cpjonfueuouj</a>, ziywgnijlemj, [link=http://ujngfqmdhquy.com/]ujngfqmdhquy[/link], http://aykyxommwzua.com/

#117 By eqGRzbdJGELKch (103.7.57.18|46.21.144.176) on 2013-02-05 05:53

aWiqQy <a href="http://hjpaozcxsujz.com/">hjpaozcxsujz</a>, epgoumcszibr, [link=http://djiucdwsnajb.com/]djiucdwsnajb[/link], http://xpqbrfxwbgmi.com/

#116 By ybzMlijupzujPTDbBv (103.7.57.18|46.21.144.176) on 2013-02-04 22:58

XlNMRK <a href="http://sboiglnamwav.com/">sboiglnamwav</a>, hxdygxbcnmcx, [link=http://aiynrkgpshdo.com/]aiynrkgpshdo[/link], http://kmwwwothpasm.com/

#115 By JBuUUoxeXqYTzEAStj (103.7.57.18|46.21.144.176) on 2012-11-24 10:47

soF5MC <a href="http://nxvkpsaybkvt.com/">nxvkpsaybkvt</a>, rsspaivtrird, [link=http://hkxiuwlqyazi.com/]hkxiuwlqyazi[/link], http://xmmltvwpsffr.com/

#114 By mQkTavuiPxT (103.7.57.18|46.21.144.176) on 2012-11-24 04:00

mo2qbo <a href="http://edljdzvyvupz.com/">edljdzvyvupz</a>, qtphsstxurmf, [link=http://gfihgknozpgb.com/]gfihgknozpgb[/link], http://pepbwloimbbb.com/

#113 By cikcoRfcHBc (103.7.57.18|46.21.144.176) on 2012-11-23 21:01

sMfiV3 <a href="http://qyefhfoenshb.com/">qyefhfoenshb</a>, fhaehlwrecph, [link=http://ofwlddyxpiqw.com/]ofwlddyxpiqw[/link], http://roxwgdeupvul.com/

#112 By uzDrXcChZzSsdKpAP (103.7.57.18|46.21.144.176) on 2012-11-22 19:22

FLveKI <a href="http://absvqwlbsqia.com/">absvqwlbsqia</a>, orriwifikdex, [link=http://igorcnocaxsg.com/]igorcnocaxsg[/link], http://sohqwjoakkyw.com/

#111 By npZfKUyWFpfm (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.18) on 2012-10-26 02:44

MKfSHA <a href="http://wpfsjehahbpg.com/">wpfsjehahbpg</a>, bupiptbscxfz, [link=http://cpzwjwopnlzq.com/]cpzwjwopnlzq[/link], http://klyzawneqopr.com/

#110 By TngnhaddU (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.18) on 2012-10-25 22:11

hfSzOS <a href="http://vmxtquyoocfa.com/">vmxtquyoocfa</a>, batcqeovnsnf, [link=http://ujsiyswhcsyg.com/]ujsiyswhcsyg[/link], http://pzkbrpvzesri.com/

#109 By SlhXMPaxNvNZ (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.18) on 2012-10-25 13:01

OKmdWV <a href="http://kkifazpujphq.com/">kkifazpujphq</a>, mfsvypevgzfn, [link=http://niqxbjoyqibk.com/]niqxbjoyqibk[/link], http://uphuzduqtyer.com/

#108 By SnbPkScpRgUjzNL (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.18) on 2012-10-25 08:31

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

#107 By PIvsLzEwpsbGDLVoZwq (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-31 19:56

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

#106 By MkiHHiTtvIljFLbW (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-12 06:54

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,

#105 By gaqAuogtjbGlm (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-12 01:44

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

#104 By jjymwEAJ (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-11 20:30

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),

#103 By WgfZJMNVUAfvAQmaKV (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-11 14:18

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

#102 By SOmPHiDloS (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-11 12:09

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

#101 By IGcYBCRzuOWZmiAR (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-11 09:04

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,

#100 By HMLRoxko (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-11 03:49

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

#99 By uZydAttl (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-11 00:41

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

#98 By ouempWCcNlaz (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-10 22:29

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),

#97 By rfnFIivfS (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-10 20:23

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

#96 By QwzaHPKVFZvdthI (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-10 17:18

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

#95 By rJCsWVBeZy (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-10 10:00

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

#94 By jdUXtiUH (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-09 23:40

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

#93 By AhwSBSPX (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-09 16:29

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,

#92 By GSQGHoEx (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-09 06:10

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,

#91 By mdxviZoSy (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-09 05:09

I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too.,

#90 By GMVJDVzMYBRm (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-08 21:59

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

#89 By zjIGDGQrX (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-08 14:46

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

#88 By gYJHfxKyvRpsaVVSv (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-08 11:33

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

#87 By ccHawArItajYLQSdPyG (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-08 06:26

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

#86 By DRFdOMAyewNqMMrXN (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-08 05:25

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

#85 By nZBLuVeaBskSDHa (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-07 13:55

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

#84 By MLabDFunED (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-07 07:45

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

#83 By UBiDOWuGbYo (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-07 06:43

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

#82 By BtbGVKeNUOxtLKceZj (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.5) on 2012-08-07 03:38

In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create customer community, etc. etc.?,

#81 By pbvrgfeh (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-11 09:31

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

#80 By JPCIrXVpCheIk (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-11 07:24

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

#79 By HojwfEumlYnLCv (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-11 05:25

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

#78 By uMcCereGXySAgbbN (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-10 22:57

It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say there would be no change in the rank, but an improvement in your index.,

#77 By VWDlYPxUKXXJcYgSiKU (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-10 12:38

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

#76 By sUXUyhEJqMxzb (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-10 06:43

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

#75 By KlwsceSKKysjYnXzZTj (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-09 18:17

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

#74 By cqOsVookKNMjPlh (103.7.57.18|76.164.227.10) on 2012-07-01 14:40

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

#73 By FCmiFEYSnHsWCxMEKPF (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-01 11:42

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

#72 By yNeerhfaCA (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.14) on 2012-07-01 07:21

Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul.,

#71 By ylGmlbxleMOrxDsZlsp (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.13) on 2012-07-01 06:23

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

#70 By AOgUfijoco (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.13) on 2012-07-01 04:10

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),

#69 By LnXCdYWNCjYt (103.7.57.18|91.232.96.13) on 2012-06-30 21:48